To
e) one might object saying that the experience of
saying the man's name was not the experience of familiarity, that
he had to be familiar to us in order that we might know his name,
163.
and that we had to
know his
name in order that we might say it.
Or, we might say, “Saying his name is not enough, for
surely we might say the name without knowing that it was his
name.”
And this remark is certainly true if only we realise that it does not
imply that knowing the name is a process accompanying or preceding saying
the name.