125.
     If someone talked to me with a kinˇdly play of facial expressions, is it necessary that in any short interval his face should have
looked
been
such that seeing it
under any other circumstances
at any other time
I should have called its expression distinctly kindly? And if not, does this mean that his “kindly play of expression” was interrupted by periods of inexpressiveness? ‒ ‒ We certainly should not say this under the circumstances which I am assuming, and we don't feel that the look at this moment
interrupted
interrupts
the expressiveness, although taken alone we should call it inexpressive.