​ 
     One might be inclined to say, “Surely a similarity must strike us, or we shouldn't be {
driven
inclinedmoved
 to use the same word”. ‒ ‒ Compare this statement with that: “A similarity between these cases must strike us in order that we should be inclined to use the same picture to represent both”. This says that some act must precede the act of using this picture. But why shouldn't
82.
what we call “the similarity striking us” consist partially or wholly in our using the same picture? And why shouldn't it consist partially or wholly in our being prompted to use the same phrase?
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-310,81[6]et82[1]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-310,81[6]et82[1]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-310,81[6]et82[1]_d/json