​ 
       Why
should
do
 we say
a
the
 proposition is something
queer
extraordinarych
? On the one hand because of the immense
importance
significance
 of that falls attaches to it ˇpropositions have. (And th[at|is] is so far it's correct.) On the other hand this
importance,
significance,
and
together with
 misunderstandings of ˇconcerning the logic of ˇour language, mislead us into thinking the ˇthat ˇa propositions must perform something a very extraordinaryˇ feat, in fact ˇsomething a uniqueˇ feat. – Because of Through [a|A] a misunderstanding makes it seems it appears
to us
to us
that
as though
a
the
 proposition d[oe|id]s does something strange.
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,67[3]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,67[3]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,67[3]_d/json