Here || And
here we come up against the
big question
that lies || lying behind all
these considerations || the enquiries we have
been making:
For || for
one might
object || say to me:
“
You
take || You're taking it easy!
You talk
about || of all sorts
of language games, but you have
47
¤ never said what it is
that
is || that's essential
to || about a language
game, and
that means || thus to
language
. What it
is that is || ; what's in common to all these
processes || procedures
and || that makes
us call them
language || languages,
or parts of
the || a
language.
You treat yourself to
precisely || That means you
now don't bother || don't
bother now about that part of the enquiry
,
therefore, which at one time gave you the greatest
puzzlement || difficulty,
namely that concerning the
general form of the
proposition.” || and of
language.” And
that || this
is true. –
Instead of
stating || pointing out
something which is
in common to all that we call language, I
say there is
no one thing || nothing
in common to these phenomena
on account in virtue of which
we || that makes us use the same
name || word for all of
them
, – they are
related || akin
to
one another || each other
in many different ways.
And
on account || because of
this
relationship, or these
relationships, || kinship we call them all
“languages”.
I
will || shall try to
explain this.