¤ this thing”, “pointing to that thing”, and on the other hand “pointing to the colour and not to the shape”, “meaning the colour”, etc., etc..
     As I say || As I have said, in certain cases, particularly in pointing to the shape, or to the number, there are characteristic experiences and ways of pointing, “characteristic” because they frequently, not always, || (not always) recur || occur where shape or number is meant. But do you also know a characteristic experience for pointing to a figure || piece in a game as piece in a game || chessman as a chessman? – And yet one || you may say, || : “I mean this piece in the game || chessman is called ‘king’, not this particular piece || block of wood that I'm pointing to.”
     And we do here, what we do in 1000 || a host of similar cases: Because || as we can't || aren't able to mention || point out some one bodily action that || which we call pointing to the shape (as opposed, e.g., to the colour) we say that a mental activity corresponds to these words.
     Where our language leads us to expect a body || look for a physical thing, and there isn't any || a body || thing, there, || ; there we are inclined to say, is a mind. || put a spirit.