​ 
       Of course one has a right to use a mark of an asserion ˇsign in contrast, for instance, to a question mark. The mistake is only [in|to] thinking that the assertion now consists
of
in
 two acts, the consider[ati|ing]in and the asserti[on|ng] (assigning the truth value, or
whatever you call it
something of that sort
), and that we perform these acts according to the signs [in| of] the sentence,
almost
rather
 as we sing from notes. We might certainly What can be compared ˇto with the singing from notes is the reading aloudly, or softly silently, according to the written to oneself, of the signs of the sentence with singing from notes,; but not “ˇthe meaning” (ˇ◇the thinking) ˇof the sentence that is read.
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,14[2]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,14[2]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,14[2]_d/json