When we say a A judges is that etc., then we have to mention a whole proposition which a A judges is. It will not do either to mention only its constituents, or its constituents and form, but not in the proper order. This shows that a proposition itself must occur in the statement that it is judged; however, for instance, “not-p” may be explained[.|,] p must occur in it. [t|T]he question, „What is negated” must have a meaning       Always a que[x|s]tion that is negated must have a meaning. Rott!