​ 













  The point of this illustration is that the process of reasonings by wh. we discover that p ≡ ~(~p) is a tautology, is exactly the same by which we reason “if a–true implies b–false, etc..” The The point is: that the process of reasoning by wh. we
arrive at
get at
 the result that a – b – a – p ˇ … is the same symbol as a – p … , is exactly the same as that by which we discover , as regards its meaning that its meaning is the same, viz. where we reason if b – apb – a then not apb, if a – b – ap then not b – apb, :. if a – b – ap. then apb.
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-301,19[1]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-301,19[1]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-301,19[1]_d/json