​ 
    What in this case is the condition. Or how would I get a contradiction? E.g. if I said they ˇA B C D are aequidistant, α β γ δ are not eaquidistant & parallel lines are drawn between them.
    And here Russells correlation seems to furnish a criterion of their correlatability. A logical criterion.
    Isn't it very queer that by just looking at the names I should be able to say whether or not a certain relation held between the objects?
    But I correlate the names. And why? To see whether a correlation can
subsist
exist
 between the things.
Correlation
Correspondence
We draw lines in our thought


 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-150,91[3]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-150,91[3]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-150,91[3]_d/json