What in this case is the condition. Or how would I get a contradiction? E.g. if I said they || A B C D are equidistant, α β γ δ are not equidistant & parallel lines are drawn between them.
     And here Russell's correlation seems to furnish a criterion of their correlatability. A logical criterion.
     Isn't it very queer that by just looking at the names I should be able to say whether or not a certain relation held between the objects?
     But I correlate the names. And why? To see whether a correlation can exist || subsist between the things.
Correlation
Correspondence
We draw lines in our thought.


(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-150,91[3]_n

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-150,91[3]_n/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-150,91[3]_n/json