​ 
  The fact that two ideas seem here inseparably bound up suggests to us that we are dealing with one idea only & not with two & that by a queer trick our language suggests a totally different strukture of grammar than the one actually used. For we have the sentence that only I can know directely my experience & only indirectely the experience of the other person. Thisus language suggests 4 possible com[p|b]inations but rules out 2. It is as though I had used the 4 letters
44
a b c d to denote two objects only but by my notation somehow suggesting the pre that I am talking of 4.

 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-148,47r[5]et47v[1]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-148,47r[5]et47v[1]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-148,47r[5]et47v[1]_d/json