Dann hieße also das distributive Gesetz – nur etwas ungeschickt angeschrieben –: „a + (b + 1) = (a + b) + 1 . & . a + (b + (c + 1)) = (a + (b + c + ))1 . & . (a + b) + (c + 1) = ((a + b) + c) + 1”?
     Aber warum dann nicht nur „a + (b + 1) = (a + b) + 1”, da doch die beiden andern Faktoren aus dieser Gleichung folgen?

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-112,11r[2]_n

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-112,11r[2]_n/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ms-112,11r[2]_n/json